Home › Verification records › Conflicting official pages record

Conflicting official pages record

Finding: We recorded 8 cases where an issuer's own official pages contradict each other — on FX fees, limits, eligible regions, prices, shutdown dates and company entity. We show both statements.

What we checked

Method: we open the relevant pages on the issuer's website and help center and note the original wording item by item; when fetching fails or content is rendered by scripts, we open the page directly in a browser and read it again; human-verification challenges are never bypassed and are recorded as unreadable. Every entry keeps its official source URL and check date, and third-party sites are only used to find official pages, never as evidence.

DateSubjectFindingOfficial source
2026-11-10MetaMask CardFee page says 1% at cross-border merchants (free tier); FAQ says no additional FX feesupport.metamask.io
2026-11-10OKX CardOne limits article says no fixed daily limit; another FAQ describes default per-transaction and daily limitswww.okx.com
2026-11-10BleapEligibility page says EEA and Swiss residents only; homepage says available in Mexico and Brazilhelp.bleap.finance
2026-11-10PST.NETUltima card page says 16 USD; cards list page says "from 7$"pst.net
2026-11-10Bitget Wallet CardCard page's Asia Pacific list includes mainland China; support article's doesn'tweb3.bitget.com
2026-11-10Cypher CardHomepage says all cards cancelled 2026-08-08; termination notice says deactivation on the service end datecypherhq.io
2026-11-10UPayFooter names UPAY TECHNOLOGY LTD. in Denver, US; About page names UPay Fintech Co., Ltd. founded in Dubaiupay.com
2026-11-10Bybit CardTwo help-article versions disagree on whether virtual and physical cards share limits; we use the 2026-11-06 fee pagewww.bybit.com

← →

Why contradictions are so common

From these checks, most contradictions come from uneven updates: help centers keep many articles per region and version, and product changes only reach some of them; some pages change content without changing the date (Bitget's exchange card); some freeze in an old state after shutdown (Cypher's countdown). So even a single official article can be wrong — the most reliable source is still what the app shows when you apply or pay.

What readers should do

  1. For fields we mark as contradictory, go by what the app shows live.
  2. Budget using the more conservative figure, e.g. 1% cross-border for MetaMask.
  3. For eligibility conflicts, confirm with support in writing before applying.

What we will re-check next

Related reviews

More records

FAQ

Which statement do you use when official pages conflict?

For cost, we calculate with the fee-table figure and note the other; for eligibility, we follow the stricter page; both statements appear on the page.

Does MetaMask Card charge an FX fee or not?

Its fee page says 1% at cross-border merchants (free tier) while its FAQ says no additional FX fee. We calculate with 1% and note the conflict in the review.

How can I tell which statement is newest?

Page dates are only a hint, since some pages change content without changing the date; the most reliable is what the app shows when you apply or pay.