Near-zero fees as published, but only open to EEA and Swiss residents.
- KYC
- No mainland China
- Card
- VirtualPhysicalMastercard
- Fund
- SolanaBaseArbitrum
Compare 22 U-cards (USDT cards) on fees, KYC requirements and ad use, with data from issuers' websites, checked 2026-11-10.
Showing 22 cards
Near-zero fees as published, but only open to EEA and Swiss residents.
Strongest self-custody story, but the regional bar is high and most Chinese-speaking users cannot apply.
Fees are published in detail, but a fixed 0.2 USD plus 0.5% per transaction doesn't suit frequent small payments.
Publishes the bulk issuing and limits ad teams care about; the price is a 4% + 1 USD top-up fee.
One of the most completely documented ad cards; issuance and top-up costs are high, so it suits heavy spenders.
Very low spending-side fees (0 monthly, 0% cross-border); check the top-up fee in the app before opening.
Easiest option if you already use Bybit, but paying non-USD merchants with USDT costs roughly 2.9% all-in.
Transparent fees and cheap when paying in USDC, but available countries are only confirmed at application.
Transparent fees, but mainland China is on the official restricted list — check your residence first.
Established and well documented, but the rules are split into a dozen regional versions — find your own region's page first.
Very low published spending cost (0.1% spread on USDT), but eligibility can only be checked inside the app.
The most transparent document policy of the group, but only open to listed jurisdictions.
Full feature set for ad teams with zero transaction and decline fees, but a monthly fee per card.
A low-cost option for Europeans; not available to anyone else.
An established crypto card with clear ATM and limit rules, but spending fees have to be checked in the app.
Clear rules, but the restricted list excludes mainland China by document country.
Feature set fits ad teams well; get a written fee quote before signing up.
Generous limits and broad chain support, but confirm spending-side fees in the in-app preview.
Entity details are inconsistent — be cautious and test small.
The most complete compliance disclosure of an enterprise option, but pricing is by quote so it can't be compared publicly.
No annual or monthly fee, but two official pages contradict each other on mainland China.
The official site announces the service is terminated — do not top up; existing users should contact the official email about balances.
The table covers all 22 cards we track: 21 are active and one (DuPay) has announced on its website that the service is terminated. "Total cost" is the share lost when you open a first card, top up 1,000 USDT once and spend it at a merchant charging in a currency other than the card's. Click a card name for its review, with every fee and the full calculation.
| Card | Issuance | Total cost (non-USD merchant) | Documents accepted | Ad platforms | Limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMCardio | — | — | — | Officially supports all three | — |
| PokePay | 5 USD | ≥0.5% | Passport | — | — |
| RedotPay | 10 USD | ≥3.1% | — | Meta +1.5% fee | — |
| Bybit Card | 0 USD | ≥2.8% | — | — | 10,000/day · 50,000/mo USD |
| KAST | — | — | Business docs | — | No daily/monthly cap |
| ether.fi Cash | 0 USD | ≥0.5% | ID card / Passport / Passport+POA | — | — |
| UPay | — | — | — | — | — |
| KripiCard | 5 USD | 4.6% | — | Officially supports all three | 25,000/day · 150,000/mo USD |
| ExCards | 29 USD | 7.3%–10.8% | Passport | Officially supports all three | 500,000/day · 1,000,000/mo USD |
| DuPay | — | Terminated | — | — | — |
| PhotonPay | — | — | Business docs | Officially supports all three | — |
| MetaMask Card | 0 USD | 1.0% | Passport+POA | — | 15,000/day · —/mo USD |
| Nexo Card | 0 USD | ≥2.0% | — | — | — |
| Crypto.com Visa Card | — | — | — | — | — |
| UUPAY | 10 USD | ≥1.0% | — | Officially supports all three | — |
| Bitget Wallet Card | — | — | — | — | — |
| OKX Card | — | ≥0.1% | — | — | — |
| Wirex | 0 USD | ≥0.0% | Passport+POA | — | — |
| Tevau | 10 USD | 3.8% | ID card / Passport | — | — |
| Bleap | 0 USD | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Binance Card | 0 USD | ≥2.8% | — | — | — |
| PST.NET | 10 USD | ≥1.0% | — | Officially supports all three | — |
← →
Documents are the first gate. Below, cards are grouped by the document types their official pages accept:
Complete KYC before topping up and only send funds once approved, so money doesn't get stuck in an unverified account.
Requirements differ a lot by use: ad buying needs bulk cards, high limits and platform compatibility; AI subscriptions need reliable small recurring charges and low issuance cost; online shopping needs low FX fees, 3DS and smooth refunds. Pick your use case first, then the card.
For growth teams, a U-card's value is turning stablecoin revenue straight into ad budget and using separate cards to keep spend for different ad accounts and projects apart. The trade-off is that top-up fees are usually higher than on personal cards, so the larger your monthly spend, the more each percentage point matters.
A U-card is essentially a bank card issued by a licensed issuer, except that it is funded from crypto instead of a bank account. The typical flow: you pass identity verification (KYC) with the U-card platform and get a virtual or physical card; you send USDT from an exchange or wallet to the deposit address the platform gives you; the platform converts the USDT into the card's currency (usually US dollars) at its rate and credits your card balance; when you pay, the merchant requests authorization from the issuer over Visa or Mastercard, and the charge succeeds if your balance covers it.
Three parties are involved: the U-card platform (top-ups, conversion and the app), the issuing bank or programme manager (actual issuing and settlement), and the card network (Visa / Mastercard). Many platforms are only operators with a third-party issuer behind them, which is why our reviews list "issuer" and "licences" separately. The more fully a platform discloses these, the clearer it is who is accountable when something goes wrong.
U-cards also come in different forms. Prepaid is the most common: top up first, then spend until the balance runs out. Credit-style cards (such as ether.fi Cash and Bybit Card in some regions) base your limit on your on-chain or exchange assets and settle afterwards, possibly with interest. Self-custody cards (such as MetaMask Card) don't hold a balance at all — you approve a spending allowance from your own wallet. The three forms have different risks and fee structures. For a fuller introduction see what is a U-card, and for how they differ from traditional virtual cards see U-card vs VCC.
Looking only at the issuance fee badly underestimates what a U-card costs. Between the exchange and the merchant, USDT typically passes through five steps that can each carry a fee:
Every review on this site uses this formula with the same assumptions (first card, one 1,000 USDT top-up, 10 purchases) and shows each step. That makes cards directly comparable: among cards with fully published fees, the same 1,000 USDT leaves about 990 dollars to spend at a foreign merchant on some and under 900 on others, and the gap comes mainly from top-up and FX fees, not issuance. For a step-by-step breakdown and common mistakes, see how to calculate U-card total cost.
Two more points. Top-up frequency amplifies fixed fees: if you only ever top up 100 USDT, "4% + 1 USD" becomes an effective 5%. And platforms often have a minimum top-up and minimum card balance; a minimum balance is not a fee, but it is money locked on the card.
A U-card is only for passing payments through: top up only what you will spend, and never keep a large balance on the card.
Most U-card platforms are not banks, and card balances are usually not covered by deposit insurance. If a platform's issuing partner changes policy, cards can be frozen, merchants restricted or the service shut down — DuPay, which we track, showed a termination notice when we checked.
There is also compliance risk: only apply if your documents and residence meet the issuer's published policy. Do not borrow someone else's documents, buy verified accounts or use fake proof of address — these breach issuer terms and can get funds frozen permanently. On ad platforms, a card that binds successfully does not make an account safe; account review is the ad platform's decision.
For frozen cards or missing top-ups, see card frozen and top-up not arrived.
We keep re-checking the data: when an issuer changes fees or document policy, the review's check date is updated and document-policy changes are appended to the change log at the bottom of the KYC policy table. If a number here doesn't match the official page, please tell us via the about page.
A normal credit card's limit is granted by a bank based on your credit; most U-cards are prepaid, funded by the USDT you top up, and the hurdle is KYC rather than a credit check. A few U-cards are credit cards backed by crypto collateral.
It depends on the issuer. Among the cards we track, the official policies of RedotPay, ether.fi Cash, MetaMask Card, Nexo Card, UUPAY, Bleap exclude mainland China residents explicitly or via their country lists; most others don't say. See the KYC policy table for each card.
On our standard basis (open a card, top up 1,000 USDT once, spend at a non-USD merchant), cards with fully published fees lose roughly 0% to 11% (0% being Bleap's published zero fees, Europe only), mostly due to top-up and FX fees.
First check which networks the platform supports, then compare withdrawal fees. TRC20 is usually cheaper and ERC20 more expensive; choosing the wrong network can leave funds stuck.
Some issuers say on their websites that they support ad-platform billing — for example ExCards, KripiCard, PhotonPay and VMCardio — whether a card binds and charges succeed also depends on the ad account itself.
Most U-card platforms are not banks and balances are usually not covered by deposit insurance; cards can be frozen or services shut down if the platform or issuer changes policy. Top up only what you will spend and keep no large balance on the card.